Home Blog Page 829

The Uncut Review! Guns N’ Roses – Chinese Democracy

0

2* (Black Frog/ Geffen) In their heyday, Guns N' Roses were remarkable for their ability to ride catastrophe. Following Use Your Illusion I and II, however, in 1991, huge fissures developed in the band, which even they couldn't endure. One by one, the original band members left, most fatefully guitarist Slash, apparently unable to endure the “dictatorial” tendencies of singer Axl Rose. Work on this, their first album proper since then, actually began in the mid-90s. However, it's been made in such fits and starts, with such a liquid line-up (even Brian May dropped in at one point) that it would be a miracle of Sistine proportions if it amounted to anything coherent and consistent. Such worries are, sadly, not without foundation. Soundwise, Chinese Democracy is all over the place. Tracks actually vary in volume according to their disparate ages, with the likes of “I.R.S.” (around on bootleg for years) quite clearly having been cut and finished years before the track that precedes it. A similarly tangled story accompanies the music. Chinese Democracy is evidently the work of a man becoming progressively more interested in avant-rock forms: virtually every track on Chinese Democracy starts out sounding like it might amount to something that extends GNR’s parameters in truly unexpected directions (noir-ish ambient, electronic, even brass band on “Madagascar”). However, Rose's experimental hankerings generally give out after about 10 seconds. Oh Slash, where art thou? Scouring the album for redeeming moments, one could cite the steely, futurist angst of “Shackler's Revenge” and the pianistic “This I Love”, which in making Elton John and Freddie Mercury sound like Chas N' Dave, must at least merit some kind of high camp award. And in “Prostitute” Rose offers a hint of atonement which excites fleeting sympathy. What kind of surreal pass has your life come to, after all, when you get involved in a fistfight with Tommy Hilfiger? With rumours that the original G N'R are set to reform next year, and mega metal currently in the ascendancy, the insanity looks set to carry on regardless. DAVID STUBBS A full review of Guns N' Roses's Chinese Democracy will run in the next issue of Uncut, on sale November 27. For more album reviews, click here for the UNCUT music archive

2*

(Black Frog/ Geffen)

In their heyday, Guns N’ Roses were remarkable for their ability to ride catastrophe. Following Use Your Illusion I and II, however, in 1991, huge fissures developed in the band, which even they couldn’t endure. One by one, the original band members left, most fatefully guitarist Slash, apparently unable to endure the “dictatorial” tendencies of singer Axl Rose.

Work on this, their first album proper since then, actually began in the mid-90s. However, it’s been made in such fits and starts, with such a liquid line-up (even Brian May dropped in at one point) that it would be a miracle of Sistine proportions if it amounted to anything coherent and consistent.

Such worries are, sadly, not without foundation. Soundwise, Chinese Democracy is all over the place. Tracks actually vary in volume according to their disparate ages, with the likes of “I.R.S.” (around on bootleg for years) quite clearly having been cut and finished years before the track that precedes it.

A similarly tangled story accompanies the music. Chinese Democracy is evidently the work of a man becoming progressively more interested in avant-rock forms: virtually every track on Chinese Democracy starts out sounding like it might amount to something that extends GNR’s parameters in truly unexpected directions (noir-ish ambient, electronic, even brass band on “Madagascar”). However, Rose’s experimental hankerings generally give out after about 10 seconds. Oh Slash, where art thou?

Scouring the album for redeeming moments, one could cite the steely, futurist angst of “Shackler’s Revenge” and the pianistic “This I Love”, which in making Elton John and Freddie Mercury sound like Chas N’ Dave, must at least merit some kind of high camp award. And in “Prostitute” Rose offers a hint of atonement which excites fleeting sympathy. What kind of surreal pass has your life come to, after all, when you get involved in a fistfight with Tommy Hilfiger?

With rumours that the original G N’R are set to reform next year, and mega metal currently in the ascendancy, the insanity looks set to carry on regardless.

DAVID STUBBS

A full review of Guns N’ Roses’s Chinese Democracy will run in the next issue of Uncut, on sale November 27.

For more album reviews, click here for the UNCUT music archive

Radiohead, Wilco, Johnny Marr Team Up For Oxfam Music Project

0
Radiohead's Ed O'Brien and Phil Selway, former Smiths guitarist Johnny Marr and Wilco's Jeff Tweedy are amongst a host of musicians who are collaborating on the follow-up to Crowded House frontman Neil Finn's Seven Worlds Collide project, to raise money for Oxfam International. Finn explains: “Se...

Radiohead‘s Ed O’Brien and Phil Selway, former Smiths guitarist Johnny Marr and Wilco‘s Jeff Tweedy are amongst a host of musicians who are collaborating on the follow-up to Crowded House frontman Neil Finn‘s Seven Worlds Collide project, to raise money for Oxfam International.

Finn explains: “Seven years ago I invited a few friends and fellow musicians to do a special series of concerts in New Zealand under the banner Seven Worlds Collide. The concerts were an amazing experience for all of us and we are delighted to have found an opportunity to gather again, this time to expand the concept and the line-up too.”

Other artists who will take part in the new sessions in New Zealand to create the forthcoming album include Soul Coughing bassist Sebastian Steinberg, violinist Lisa Germano, KT Tunstall, Bic Runga and Liam Finn.

As with the previous Seven Worlds Collide project, live concerts will take place in Auckland in the New Year. More details to be released nearer the time.

For more music and film news click here

Choke

0

Dir: Clark Gregg St: Sam Rockwell, Anjelica Huston, Kelly Macdonald Fight Club author Chuck Palahniuk says he “could not be happier” with this adaptation of his fourth novel. The unique tone of Chuck’s books poses plenty of problems to directors: shocking, taboo-taunting and fuelled by jet-black humour, Choke dares the debuting Gregg to go too far or not far enough. That he gets it pretty much bang-on (he also appears, and wrote the screenplay) is testament to an absolute grasp of Palahniuk’s aims and themes. This is funny, twisted and perceptive. Victor (Rockwell’s best turn yet) is a conman who dupes good-doers into saving him from choking, then taps them for sympathy cheques. His day job involves costumed work at a historical theme park: cue much humour with antiquated language. Meanwhile he’s getting laid at sexaholics recovery meetings and visiting his ailing mother (Huston), who doesn’t recognise him. Her nurse (Macdonald) wants his body, but that’s because he is, perhaps, the Son Of God. A psychotically uncompromising satire of, well, damn near everything, Choke hiccups once or twice but is otherwise near perfect. CHRIS ROBERTS Pic credit: Rex Features

Dir: Clark Gregg

St: Sam Rockwell, Anjelica Huston, Kelly Macdonald

Fight Club author Chuck Palahniuk says he “could not be happier” with this adaptation of his fourth novel. The unique tone of Chuck’s books poses plenty of problems to directors: shocking, taboo-taunting and fuelled by jet-black humour, Choke dares the debuting Gregg to go too far or not far enough. That he gets it pretty much bang-on (he also appears, and wrote the screenplay) is testament to an absolute grasp of Palahniuk’s aims and themes. This is funny, twisted and perceptive.

Victor (Rockwell’s best turn yet) is a conman who dupes good-doers into saving him from choking, then taps them for sympathy cheques. His day job involves costumed work at a historical theme park: cue much humour with antiquated language. Meanwhile he’s getting laid at sexaholics recovery meetings and visiting his ailing mother (Huston), who doesn’t recognise him. Her nurse (Macdonald) wants his body, but that’s because he is, perhaps, the Son Of God.

A psychotically uncompromising satire of, well, damn near everything, Choke hiccups once or twice but is otherwise near perfect.

CHRIS ROBERTS

Pic credit: Rex Features

Waltzes With Bashir

0

DIR: ARI FOLMAN Following Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis, Waltzes With Bashir is the latest addition to the unlikely yet powerful genre of animated middle-eastern memoirs. But while Satrapi made bittersweet confessional comedy from the Iranian revolution, Ari Folman’s film is much darker, using animation to elide the gap between memory, dream and historical trauma. Folman was 20 when he served in the Israeli army occupying Lebanon in 1982, yet 25 years later finds he has no recollection of the time. Waltzes records his attempt, via conversations with friends, comrades, psychologists and reporters, to piece together the events leading up to the Phalangist massacres at Shabra and Shatila. The hand-drawn animation, reminiscent of Waking Life’s rotoscopes, at times seem clumsy, but at its best give Folman freedom to explore the subjective, elusive flow of perception. As the film progresses, Folman’s quest to recover his own past develops into an unforgettable journey into the guilt and repression of the Israeli national psyche, and its continuing deadly implications. STEPHEN TROUSSÉ

DIR: ARI FOLMAN

Following Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis, Waltzes With Bashir is the latest addition to the unlikely yet powerful genre of animated middle-eastern memoirs. But while Satrapi made bittersweet confessional comedy from the Iranian revolution, Ari Folman’s film is much darker, using animation to elide the gap between memory, dream and historical trauma.

Folman was 20 when he served in the Israeli army occupying Lebanon in 1982, yet 25 years later finds he has no recollection of the time. Waltzes records his attempt, via conversations with friends, comrades, psychologists and reporters, to piece together the events leading up to the Phalangist massacres at Shabra and Shatila.

The hand-drawn animation, reminiscent of Waking Life’s rotoscopes, at times seem clumsy, but at its best give Folman freedom to explore the subjective, elusive flow of perception. As the film progresses, Folman’s quest to recover his own past develops into an unforgettable journey into the guilt and repression of the Israeli national psyche, and its continuing deadly implications.

STEPHEN TROUSSÉ

Pete Doherty To Perform Trio of Christmas Shows In London

0
Pete Doherty has confirmed that he to perform a three night stint at East London's Rhythm Factory venue next month. The Babyshambles frontman and ex-Libertines member is set to perform three solo shows on December 20, 21 and 22. See the venue's website Rhythmfactory.co.uk, for more information. F...

Pete Doherty has confirmed that he to perform a three night stint at East London’s Rhythm Factory venue next month.

The Babyshambles frontman and ex-Libertines member is set to perform three solo shows on December 20, 21 and 22.

See the venue’s website Rhythmfactory.co.uk, for more information.

For more music and film news from Uncut.co.uk click here.

Leonard Cohen: Behind the Scenes, Part 5!

0

Hallelujah!: LEONARD COHEN SPECIAL In the December issue of Uncut, we celebrate Leonard Cohen’s comeback by getting the inside story from his bandmates on their extraordinary year on the road. Here at www.uncut.co.ukover the next month, we’ll be posting the full, unedited transcripts of those interviews in a new, seven-part series. Today we present: BRUCE RODGERS - Founder of the company Tribe Inc, Rodgers has been behind the set designs for musical extravaganzas from the touring shows of Madonna, Ricky Martin, Mariah Carey and Jennifer Lopez, through to the all-star tributes to Brian Wilson and Johnny Cash. Click here to read the interview. Part six of seven, is coming up on Wednesday November 19!

Hallelujah!: LEONARD COHEN SPECIAL

In the December issue of Uncut, we celebrate Leonard Cohen’s comeback by getting the inside story from his bandmates on their extraordinary year on the road. Here at www.uncut.co.ukover the next month, we’ll be posting the full, unedited transcripts of those interviews in a new, seven-part series.

Today we present: BRUCE RODGERS – Founder of the company Tribe Inc, Rodgers has been behind the set designs for musical extravaganzas from the touring shows of Madonna, Ricky Martin, Mariah Carey and Jennifer Lopez, through to the all-star tributes to Brian Wilson and Johnny Cash.

Click here to read the interview.

Part six of seven, is coming up on Wednesday November 19!

Leonard Cohen: Behind The Scenes, Part 5!

0

Hallelujah!: LEONARD COHEN SPECIAL In the December issue of Uncut, we celebrate Leonard Cohen’s comeback by getting the inside story from his bandmates on their extraordinary year on the road. Here at www.uncut.co.ukover the next month, we’ll be posting the full, unedited transcripts of those interviews in a new, seven-part series. Today we present: BRUCE RODGERS Founder of the company Tribe Inc, Rodgers has been behind the set designs for musical extravaganzas from the touring shows of Madonna, Ricky Martin, Mariah Carey and Jennifer Lopez, through to the all-star tributes to Brian Wilson and Johnny Cash. **** UNCUT: When and how did you get involved in the project? RODGERS: I was contacted by Anne Militello, a friend and a great lighting designer. She was already on board and wanted to introduce me to Leonard and his manager Robert Kory. I was on the east coast however and booked pretty solid so my introduction happened via email and phone calls and Anne handled all the face to face time. You've worked with lots of other big names and projects -- how does it differ from them? On every project the first thing I do is dive into the music. I was aware of Leonard's music but once I started listening and feeling around for a look I became his greatest fan. I found a connection easily. The biggest difference was the music could stand on it's own ...it needed no scenery per se...it made me find a way to stay as subtle as possible and let Leonard and Anne do all the work. How involved was Leonard in the design? Is he very hands-on? As far as the design and layout he was very involved, he was the master planner of the placement of all his band members. We tried a few platform layouts but he finessed the final plan once the set arrived in rehearsals in Los Angeles...he wanted his musicians as close and intimate as possible and we were glad to help. Is there a theme that you were working with, design-wise? Not necessarily a theme but I took the approach to design the set as an extension of who Leonard is to me, Leonard is a very elegant gentleman and dresses that way. His music is from the heart and he's also a great artist. He allows us to see into his heart when he sings and I wanted the feel of the set to be like him, subtle and silvery grey and translucent, mysterious and full of light at times, dark and moody at others. My setting this not only gave me the feelings I was after but also gives Anne the ability to tone the space thru out the evening. Do you transport the set everywhere or do you make up different backdrops in each country/region? The set we built in Los Angeles is the set used everywhere. Do you socialise with Leonard? What's he like? I didn’t...but Anne and Robert tell me he's a real gentleman. As an artist I get a vibe from him that he's real like us but his ability to make music allows him to transcend to higher places. I'm proud to be a small part of his life. JOHN LEWIS

Hallelujah!: LEONARD COHEN SPECIAL

In the December issue of Uncut, we celebrate Leonard Cohen’s comeback by getting the inside story from his bandmates on their extraordinary year on the road. Here at www.uncut.co.ukover the next month, we’ll be posting the full, unedited transcripts of those interviews in a new, seven-part series.

Today we present: BRUCE RODGERS

Founder of the company Tribe Inc, Rodgers has been behind the set designs for musical extravaganzas from the touring shows of Madonna, Ricky Martin, Mariah Carey and Jennifer Lopez, through to the all-star tributes to Brian Wilson and Johnny Cash.

****

UNCUT: When and how did you get involved in the project?

RODGERS: I was contacted by Anne Militello, a friend and a great lighting designer. She was already on board and wanted to introduce me to Leonard and his manager Robert Kory. I was on the east coast however and booked pretty solid so my introduction happened via email and phone calls and Anne handled all the face to face time.

You’ve worked with lots of other big names and projects — how does it differ from them?

On every project the first thing I do is dive into the music. I was aware of Leonard’s music but once I started listening and feeling around for a look I became his greatest fan. I found a connection easily. The biggest difference was the music could stand on it’s own …it needed no scenery per se…it made me find a way to stay as subtle as possible and let Leonard and Anne do all the work.

How involved was Leonard in the design? Is he very hands-on?

As far as the design and layout he was very involved, he was the master planner of the placement of all his band members. We tried a few platform layouts but he finessed the final plan once the set arrived in rehearsals in Los Angeles…he wanted his musicians as close and intimate as possible and we were glad to help.

Is there a theme that you were working with, design-wise?

Not necessarily a theme but I took the approach to design the set as an extension of who Leonard is to me, Leonard is a very elegant gentleman and dresses that way. His music is from the heart and he’s also a great artist. He allows us to see into his heart when he sings and I wanted the feel of the set to be like him, subtle and silvery grey and translucent, mysterious and full of light at times, dark and moody at others. My setting this not only gave me the feelings I was after but also gives Anne the ability to tone the space thru out the evening.

Do you transport the set everywhere or do you make up different backdrops in each country/region?

The set we built in Los Angeles is the set used everywhere.

Do you socialise with Leonard? What’s he like?

I didn’t…but Anne and Robert tell me he’s a real gentleman. As an artist I get a vibe from him that he’s real like us but his ability to make music allows him to transcend to higher places. I’m proud to be a small part of his life.

JOHN LEWIS

Paul McCartney Confirms ‘Carnival Of Light’ Beatles Track Exists

0
Paul McCartney has confirmed that a Beatles track called "Carnival of Light", does exist, and could be released if Ringo Starr and the estates of Lennon and Harrison agree. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Front Row programme about the track, McCartney says that the 14 minute improvised track was recorded...

Paul McCartney has confirmed that a Beatles track called “Carnival of Light”, does exist, and could be released if Ringo Starr and the estates of Lennon and Harrison agree.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Front Row programme about the track, McCartney says that the 14 minute improvised track was recorded at Abbey Road in 1967 for an electronic music festival, and was only performed live once.

The track, long thought to be a recording myth, was not released at the time as the rest of the band thought it was too “adventurous”, but McCartney says he wants the public to hear it now saying, “The time has come for it to get its moment.”

BBC News reports Paul as explaining how the track was made and what it sounds like.

He says: “I said all I want you to do is just wander around all the stuff, bang it, shout, play it, it doesn’t need to make any sense. Hit a drum then wander on to the piano, hit a few notes, just wander around. So that’s what we did and then put a bit of an echo on it. It’s very free.”

The full interview is set to be broadcast on Radio 4 this Thursday (November 20) at 7.15pm (GMT).

Meanwhile, the lowest numbered vinyl pressing of The Beatles’ White album is currently up to £6, 505 on trading site eBay. More details about the auction here.

For more music and film news click here

Guns N’ Roses – Chinese Democracy

0

In their heyday, Guns N' Roses were remarkable for their ability to ride catastrophe. Following Use Your Illusion I and II, however, in 1991, huge fissures developed in the band, which even they couldn't endure. One by one, the original band members left, most fatefully guitarist Slash, apparently unable to endure the “dictatorial” tendencies of singer Axl Rose. Work on this, their first album proper since then, actually began in the mid-90s. However, it's been made in such fits and starts, with such a liquid line-up (even Brian May dropped in at one point) that it would be a miracle of Sistine proportions if it amounted to anything coherent and consistent. Such worries are, sadly, not without foundation. Soundwise, Chinese Democracy is all over the place. Tracks actually vary in volume according to their disparate ages, with the likes of “I.R.S.” (around on bootleg for years) quite clearly having been cut and finished years before the track that precedes it. A similarly tangled story accompanies the music. Chinese Democracy is evidently the work of a man becoming progressively more interested in avant-rock forms: virtually every track on Chinese Democracy starts out sounding like it might amount to something that extends GNR’s parameters in truly unexpected directions (noir-ish ambient, electronic, even brass band on “Madagascar”). However, Rose's experimental hankerings generally give out after about 10 seconds. Oh Slash, where art thou? Scouring the album for redeeming moments, one could cite the steely, futurist angst of “Shackler's Revenge” and the pianistic “This I Love”, which in making Elton John and Freddie Mercury sound like Chas N' Dave, must at least merit some kind of high camp award. And in “Prostitute” Rose offers a hint of atonement which excites fleeting sympathy. What kind of surreal pass has your life come to, after all, when you get involved in a fistfight with Tommy Hilfiger? With rumours that the original G N'R are set to reform next year, and mega metal currently in the ascendancy, the insanity looks set to carry on regardless. DAVID STUBBS A full review of Guns N' Roses's Chinese Democracy will run in the next issue of Uncut, on sale November 27. For more album reviews, click here for the UNCUT music archive

In their heyday, Guns N’ Roses were remarkable for their ability to ride catastrophe. Following Use Your Illusion I and II, however, in 1991, huge fissures developed in the band, which even they couldn’t endure. One by one, the original band members left, most fatefully guitarist Slash, apparently unable to endure the “dictatorial” tendencies of singer Axl Rose.

Work on this, their first album proper since then, actually began in the mid-90s. However, it’s been made in such fits and starts, with such a liquid line-up (even Brian May dropped in at one point) that it would be a miracle of Sistine proportions if it amounted to anything coherent and consistent.

Such worries are, sadly, not without foundation. Soundwise, Chinese Democracy is all over the place. Tracks actually vary in volume according to their disparate ages, with the likes of “I.R.S.” (around on bootleg for years) quite clearly having been cut and finished years before the track that precedes it.

A similarly tangled story accompanies the music. Chinese Democracy is evidently the work of a man becoming progressively more interested in avant-rock forms: virtually every track on Chinese Democracy starts out sounding like it might amount to something that extends GNR’s parameters in truly unexpected directions (noir-ish ambient, electronic, even brass band on “Madagascar”). However, Rose’s experimental hankerings generally give out after about 10 seconds. Oh Slash, where art thou?

Scouring the album for redeeming moments, one could cite the steely, futurist angst of “Shackler’s Revenge” and the pianistic “This I Love”, which in making Elton John and Freddie Mercury sound like Chas N’ Dave, must at least merit some kind of high camp award. And in “Prostitute” Rose offers a hint of atonement which excites fleeting sympathy. What kind of surreal pass has your life come to, after all, when you get involved in a fistfight with Tommy Hilfiger?

With rumours that the original G N’R are set to reform next year, and mega metal currently in the ascendancy, the insanity looks set to carry on regardless.

DAVID STUBBS

A full review of Guns N’ Roses’s Chinese Democracy will run in the next issue of Uncut, on sale November 27.

For more album reviews, click here for the UNCUT music archive

Drive-By Truckers: “Brighter Than Creation’s Dark”

0

Episode Three of our judge's discussions, and today we find them discussing Drive-By Truckers. Tomorrow, The Felice Brothers. Alison Howe: I knew nothing about the Drive-By Truckers at all. I put it on and I enjoyed it, I learned something, which is always a good thing. But there was a moment, I don’t know which song it was, one of the first two or three, and I don’t know whether it was subliminal or whether it really was in the lyrics, I’m convinced he sang “The Hold Steady” at some point. And to me The Hold Steady should be in this list rather than the Drive-By Truckers. I really liked their record, and I was surprised they weren’t here, and for the rest of this record that’s all I could think about. I enjoyed it, but it just passed me by. It’s not the sort of thing I tend to listen to, personally, unlike a lot of the other records, and I wish I had more emotive things to say about it. Allan Jones: They’re one of my favourite groups, but I was surprised to see it getting on to the shortlist. Mark Radcliffe: I’m with Alison, I think it’s the poor relation of this shortlist. I think it’s quite nice, just standard American alt. country; the best bits sound like Neil Young, it’s not shit, it’s fine. Some quite nice songs but there’s nothing out of the ordinary on it at all. Danny Kelly: I’m not going to say anything that’ll drive it higher in other people’s estimation. I actually really like it, but I don’t think it’s as good as The Hold Steady’s record. That’s a belting record, while this is just another record by a very good band. It’s kind of an enforced lesson in American rock and alternative rock over the last 30 years. Where it’s good, it’s very very good, and it’s never really terrible or anything like that. What I’ve got against it is that there’s just so much of it. Mark: They’ve got three songwriters, so they’re all trying to shoehorn their own things into it. Allan: Just before recording it they lost their fourth songwriter, so it could have been another 20 minutes longer! Danny: Anyone who has any interest in popular music to come out and say they hate the record is obviously a liar. There’s nothing to hate about it, it’s very good in places. They kind of passed me by, but when I heard that Patterson Hood was David Hood’s son the record immediately went up five notches for me, because of the work he did particularly with Bobby Womack in the early ‘70s. I don’t believe you should judge records by their parentage. . . Linda Thompson: Definitely you should! – Danny: Well, since this is clearly not gonna win we can loosen our corsets a bit, actually these things do matter. Mark mentioned that Elbow have been together man and boy, and that does bring something to the party. But since I honestly don’t think it’s not even as good as its close relative that didn’t make the list, I can’t go for this. Allan: There’s 17 tracks on there, quite dense songwriting as well that’s not always very clear in the narrative, and I think it probably speaks to their fans more than it would to a broader audience, hence my surprise that they’d actually made the shortlist. Danny: It’s not their best record, even. Allan: It’s pleasing to see them getting the recognition, but I fancy it will appeal to people who’ve not heard them before and probably weren’t too familiar with that kind of music. Danny: I enjoyed it thoroughly, but not in any way that would make me want to go out and buy the previous record, which is always a good test for me. Allan: There are two or three earlier records that would probably represent them more forcefully and in a much more focused way as well. Linda: Not much to add to that, really. I’m friends with Spooner Oldham, and he told me about this group and anyone he loves I usually love. But I’ve heard better bands in Nashville in bars, I really truly have. There’s good picking, but you expect that, and I liked the song “The Purgatory Line”, but for the most part I thought the record was unremarkable. It just didn’t do much for me. Tony Wadsworth: Nobody ever said a record was too short, and I think people should learn that lesson. There’s too many bloody long records around, unfortunately, and you can’t navigate your way around a 70-minute record, it’s really quite hard. I love this type of music, but it is just a fair-to-good example of it. I do like the track “Bob”, though, it’s a nice little cameo of a song, but was sort of the only thing I could pick out of it. The rest of it was just OK alt. country.

Episode Three of our judge’s discussions, and today we find them discussing Drive-By Truckers. Tomorrow, The Felice Brothers.

Leonard Cohen, London 02 Arena, Nov 13 2008

0

Leonard Cohen comes on stage at a veritable trot, almost skipping, more sprightly by a distance than you would expect of a man in his mid-seventies. The crowd, who have clearly come to adore him, reward his athleticism with a standing ovation. It’s the first of many tonight, although the others that follow are for performances of songs from his majestic back catalogue that are played to something we’d have to call perfection. From the reverent hush that now settles on this vast auditorium, the 02 audience is in its entirety in awe of him, hang on his every word, as if his every utterance is some kind of benediction, the music, in smooth washes, rolling over them, the songs coming in wave after wave over the next three hours. For his part, he is as dapper as the devil, handsomely tailored, a fedora at a rakish tilt, clearly relishing the triumph of his current remarkable comeback, essaying a little soft-shoe shuffle during “Dance Me To The End Of Love”, the opening number. I’m pretty awe-struck myself, as with regal composure, on song after song after song, he reminds me of the ways in which this music has meant so much to me down the years and occupied at times such a central place in my life and the people who’ve shared it with me. And so as I sit as spellbound as anyone else here tonight, enchanted and moved and amused, laughing out loud at parts of Cohen’s patter, which might not change much from night to night but is still wonderfully wry. “The times are hard and a lot of you are going to be driven to drink,” he says, introducing “”That Don’t Make It Junk” as a song that will at that point enlighten particular turning point in our lives. The highlights would include everything on the generous set-list, but mention might be made of gorgeous versions of his earliest songs – “Hey, That’s No Way To Say Goodbye”, “Suzanne”, a stunning “So Long, Marianne”, from The Songs Of Leonard Cohen, and “Bird On A Wire” and a gaspingly beautiful “The Partisan” from Songs From A Room, the latter a lament so haunting it surely brings tears to thousands of eyes. Elsewhere, “Hallelujah”, “Tower Of Song”, “Anthem”, “Who By Fire” and “First We Take Manhattan” are just unforgettable, delivered by Cohen with his shoulders hunched and his eyes closed in secret rapture. He’s elegantly served by a band for whom the word impeccable seems shoddily inadequate, who would seem perhaps too singularly polished and refined if it wasn’t for the quiet passion of their playing – particularly the virtuoso Javier Mas on 12-string guitar, seated to Cohen’s left, who astonishes throughout. And what can I say about the vocal support of Sharon Robinson and the Webb Sisters? Theirs are voices that seem not quite of this world, or even the next, sublime and wondrous and not a little sexy at times. What will stay with me longest, though, is Cohen returning to the stage, the lights still low around him and through the melancholy darkness offering up a sublime reading of perhaps his greatest song, “Famous Blue Raincoat”. “Thanks for keeping my songs alive for so many years,” he had said, introducing the second half of the show, although it must be said that songs as great as these have a life of their own that will outlast us all. First set 1 Dance Me To The End Of Love 2 The Future 3 Ain't No Cure For Love 4 Bird On A Wire 5 Everybody Knows 6 In My Secret Life 7 Who By Fire 8 Hey, That's No Way To Say Goodbye 9 That Don’t Make It Junk 10 Anthem Second set 11 Tower Of Song 12 Suzanne 13 Gypsy Wife 14 The Partisan 15 Boogie Street 16 Hallelujah 17 I'm Your Man 18 A Thousand Kisses 19 Take This Waltz Encore 1 20 So Long, Marianne 21 First We Take Manhattan Encore 2 22 Famous Blue Raincoat 23 If It Be Your Will 24.Democracy 25 I Tried To Leave You

Leonard Cohen comes on stage at a veritable trot, almost skipping, more sprightly by a distance than you would expect of a man in his mid-seventies. The crowd, who have clearly come to adore him, reward his athleticism with a standing ovation. It’s the first of many tonight, although the others that follow are for performances of songs from his majestic back catalogue that are played to something we’d have to call perfection.

First Look — Watchmen footage

0

Gentle readers of UNCUT, you can rest easy. While large chunks of the Internet seem obsessed with quite how slavishly close to the original Zack Snyder’s treatment of Watchmen, the Holy Grail of modern comics, will be, I think we can permit ourselves a small smile. Bob Dylan, it seems, is a fan. Dylan’s music is one of the many tangential influences on Watchmen, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ superhero graphic novel. Readers of the series may recall one key sequence, where we do indeed see two riders approaching while a wild cat howls. Perhaps a less obvious reference point would be “Desolation Row”’; according to Gibbons in a Q+A session following this screening, the lines “Now at midnight all the agents/And the superhuman crew/Come out and round up everyone/That knows more than they do” were one of the starting points for the comic. More conspicuously, “The Times They Are A-Changin’” plays over the opening credits of Snyder’s film, a move that’s apparently been met with approval by Dylan himself. That we’re talking about a superhero movie that uses Dylan as a prominent touchstone should give you some indication that Watchmen isn’t your generic blokes in tights beating up other blokes in tights property. Watchmen, the series, is credited as a pivotal moment when the medium “grew up”, introducing shade and depth to the four-colour world of the comic book. Set in a parallel 1985, where Nixon is President and the Cold War is going strong, Watchmen is still men in tights fighting other men in tights, but among other things, there’s a greater psychological complexity behind the characters and their motivation. One of Moore and Gibbons’ key aims was to deconstruct the superhero genre. So with the character of Rorschach we got the costumed crime fighter as sociopathic vigilante; the question of what would really happen if a character developed total super powers was answered in the blue-skinned, Godlike form of Dr Manhattan; while with the self-made, hyper-intelligent Ozymandias, they explored the idea of how a character’s philanthropic desire to do good could be morally and tragically compromised. And with The Comedian, whose murder opens both the comic and the film, Moore and Gibbons created arguably their most fascinating character: a cynical vigilante turned government agent, whose activities included political assassination and running Black Ops in Vietnam. Of course, there’s more to the comic than that. The incredible detail and layering of the story, the subtle repetition of images and references (clocks, particularly) is extraordinary. The use of a rigid, 9 panel per page grid, echoing film frames, gave the book a broadly cinematic feel. I remember buying issue 1 from Forbidden Planet on Denmark Street in late 1986 and being completely flawed by it. I’d grown up on both Moore and Gibbons’ work in 2000AD – Moore’s The Ballad Of Halo Jones is still one of the greatest comic stories I’ve ever read – but I honestly don’t think I was prepared for how incredibly complex and rigorously intelligent Watchmen was. Which brings me to Zack Snyder’s film. As someone who has no real love for zombie movies, I couldn’t really care much about his “reimagining” (awful word) of Romero’s Dawn Of The Dead. 300 was fine enough, as a literal page-to-screen adaptation. In this morning’s Q&A, Snyder made clear he wanted to do Watchmen justice – if only to stop another film maker from cocking it up. It seems that mostly involves another pretty close frame-for-shot adaptation. One of the three, 10-minute sequences screened corresponds with Watchmen Chapter IV, called Watchmaker, which finds Dr Manhattan alone on Mars contemplating his life. It’s one of the highlights in the comic, displaying Moore’s adroit story-telling skills as he jumps around through time periods – from Jon Osterman being shown the inner workings of a watch by his father shortly after the bombing of Hiroshima, cutting to Osterman’s accident that facilitates his transformation into Dr Manhattan; his relationships; the attempts by the military to turn him into a superhuman weapon. Speaking to UNCUT in 2000, Moore admitted that that issue was “still one of the best things I’ve done.” And Snyder pretty much adapts it, if not shot-for-shot, then as close as to make no difference. But I can’t help wondering why, and exactly who this benefits. Ahead of the Hughes brothers’ film of his graphic novel, From Hell, Moore made an important distinction: “It’s not my book. It’s their film.” Perhaps there’s something of the geek about Snyder, the comic book lover who became a film-maker and wanted to protect the integrity of one of his favourite reads, rather like Peter Jackson and The Lord Of The Rings. But, outside the legions of comic book readers, will anyone particularly care, or notice? As a movie fan, I’m excited about seeing the rest of Watchmen on the strength of the 30 minutes of footage I saw today. As a comic book fan, I’m perhaps oddly less interested in seeing the finished movie. If Snyder had set out to broadly capture the spirit and tone of the series, but brought his own interpretation of the story, it perhaps would be a fascinating exercise in book to movie evolution. As it is, just to transfer the same images from one visually sequential medium to another seems a fairly strange way of going about your business. All the same, good stuff. [youtube]2VLA0tg5yI0[/youtube] Watchmen opens in the UK in March 2009. You can see the trailer here.

Gentle readers of UNCUT, you can rest easy. While large chunks of the Internet seem obsessed with quite how slavishly close to the original Zack Snyder’s treatment of Watchmen, the Holy Grail of modern comics, will be, I think we can permit ourselves a small smile. Bob Dylan, it seems, is a fan.

Rare Beatles White Album Up For Auction

0

Just prior to the 40th anniversary of the release of the The Beatles' 'White Album'; one of the earliest pressed vinyls has gone on sale on trading website eBay. The mono pressing numbered 0000005 is the lowest numbered copy ever to have gone on sale to the public and is expected to fetch over £8, 000 according to the Record Collector Price Guide 2008. The four band members were given the first four copies, numbered 0000001 to 0000004 . You can see photos of the sleeve and record and bid on the desirable record by clicking here. Current bid is now £7, 300 as of November 18. 5 days left to run. For more music and film news click here

Just prior to the 40th anniversary of the release of the The Beatles‘ ‘White Album’; one of the earliest pressed vinyls has gone on sale on trading website eBay.

The mono pressing numbered 0000005 is the lowest numbered copy ever to have gone on sale to the public and is expected to fetch over £8, 000 according to the Record Collector Price Guide 2008.

The four band members were given the first four copies, numbered 0000001 to 0000004 .

You can see photos of the sleeve and record and bid on the desirable record by clicking here.

Current bid is now £7, 300 as of November 18. 5 days left to run.

For more music and film news click here

Elton John To Play New Year’s Eve Show In London

0
Elton John is to play London's O2 Arena on New Year's Eve, it was announced today (November 14). Produced by frined and photographer David LaChapelle, Elton has procliamed that he "Can't wait to spend New Year's Eve with 17,000 of my biggest fans." The singer is also set to play the following UK l...

Elton John is to play London’s O2 Arena on New Year’s Eve, it was announced today (November 14).

Produced by frined and photographer David LaChapelle, Elton has procliamed that he “Can’t wait to spend New Year’s Eve with 17,000 of my biggest fans.”

The singer is also set to play the following UK live shows, starting next week (November 19) and has so far announced one date for next June.

See Elton John live at the following venues:

Birmingham, National Indoor Arena (November 19)

London, The O2 Arena (December 13)

Birmingham, National Indoor Arena (16)

Liverpool, Echo Arena (17,18)

Manchester, Evening News Arena (20, 21)

London, O2 Arena (31)

Bristol, Gloucester County Cricket Ground Bristol (June 13, 2009)

For more music and film news click here

Eric Clapton Adds More Live Shows

0

Guitar maestro Eric Clapton has added three new dates to his residency at London's Royal Albert Hall, which is set to take place from May 16, 2009. The added shows are on May 28, 29 and 31, and tickets are onsale now. The now eleven night run almost equals Claptons 12 night stint at the same venue in May 1996. Clapton also played at the Crem reunion at the same venue in 2005. Clapton will now play the London venue on May 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31. He also plays at Liverpool Echo Arena on May 13 and Manchester Evening News Arena on May 14. Check out this clip of Clapton, playing Five Long Years at the Albert Hall in 1996: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiOs7u1WCBw&hl=en&fs=1 For more music and film news click here

Guitar maestro Eric Clapton has added three new dates to his residency at London’s Royal Albert Hall, which is set to take place from May 16, 2009.

The added shows are on May 28, 29 and 31, and tickets are onsale now.

The now eleven night run almost equals Claptons 12 night stint at the same venue in May 1996. Clapton also played at the Crem reunion at the same venue in 2005.

Clapton will now play the London venue on May 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31.

He also plays at Liverpool Echo Arena on May 13 and Manchester Evening News Arena on May 14.

Check out this clip of Clapton, playing Five Long Years at the Albert Hall in 1996:

For more music and film news click here

New York Dolls Reunite With Todd Rundgren

0

Glam rockers the New York Dolls have announced that they are to get Todd Rundgren to produce their next album, the first time they have enlisted his help since their eponymous debut in 1973. Founding New York Dolls members David Johansen and Sylvain Sylvain are to reunite with their original producer in January, to record the new, as-yet-untitled album. Having made some festival appearences this Summer, the Dolls also say they plan on touring once the album is complete. Frontman Johansen commented about the reunion saying: "We're really excited to be working with Todd again. We're hoping to recapture the same magic on the forthcoming album [that was on the debut]." Meanwhile, Rudgren will be headlining a couple of shows in the UK later this month, playing the Norwich Waterfront on November 22 and the London Forum on November 23. For more music and film news click here Pic: Marty Temme

Glam rockers the New York Dolls have announced that they are to get Todd Rundgren to produce their next album, the first time they have enlisted his help since their eponymous debut in 1973.

Founding New York Dolls members David Johansen and Sylvain Sylvain are to reunite with their original producer in January, to record the new, as-yet-untitled album. Having made some festival appearences this Summer, the Dolls also say they plan on touring once the album is complete.

Frontman Johansen commented about the reunion saying: “We’re really excited to be working with Todd again. We’re hoping to recapture the same magic on the forthcoming album [that was on the debut].”

Meanwhile, Rudgren will be headlining a couple of shows in the UK later this month, playing the Norwich Waterfront on November 22 and the London Forum on November 23.

For more music and film news click here

Pic: Marty Temme

Uncut Music Award: See How Fleet Foxes Won!

0

As revealed earlier this week, Seattle group Fleet Foxes' eponymous debut album has scooped the first ever Uncut Music Award, for the "most rewarding and inspiring album" of the past 12 months. Unanimously hailed by a panel of industry judges which included broadcaster Mark Radcliffe and ex EMI chief executive Tony Wadsworth, at a judging session in November to choose the overall winner from eight shortlisted albums. Check out the behind-the-scenes video below made on the day the album was awarded the prize and meet the panel too. See how the decision was made here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfhcVlOSjlU&hl=en&fs=1 Over the next fortnight Uncut will also be posting blow-by-blow transcripts of the 'discussions' which took place behind closed doors at the judging session this month. Find out what's really questioned when albums go up for a prize. We will be posting what was said about each of the shortlisted albums at the Uncut Music Award blog here. For more music and film news click here

As revealed earlier this week, Seattle group Fleet Foxes‘ eponymous debut album has scooped the first ever Uncut Music Award, for the “most rewarding and inspiring album” of the past 12 months.

Unanimously hailed by a panel of industry judges which included broadcaster Mark Radcliffe and ex EMI chief executive Tony Wadsworth, at a judging session in November to choose the overall winner from eight shortlisted albums.

Check out the behind-the-scenes video below made on the day the album was awarded the prize and meet the panel too.

See how the decision was made here:

Over the next fortnight Uncut will also be posting blow-by-blow transcripts of the ‘discussions’ which took place behind closed doors at the judging session this month. Find out what’s really questioned when albums go up for a prize. We will be posting what was said about each of the shortlisted albums at the Uncut Music Award blog here.

For more music and film news click here

The 46th Uncut Playlist Of 2008

0

A bumper list this week, as the 2009 releases start arriving in the Uncut office. Not everything here is going down ecstatically, but a first listen to the new Fennesz album today suggests that one was well worth waiting for. In the continuing absence of those My Bloody Valentine reissues, let alone any unreleased material from Kevin Shields’ archives, “Black Sea” really deserves to bring Christian Fennesz to a wider audience, I think. I’ll be writing more about that next week, all being well, and I promise I’ll try not to preface it with the usual load of anti-shoegazing invective. Also next week – Monday, to be specific – I should be posting a review of tonight’s Leonard Cohen show at the O2 Arena. And while I’m on the subject of gigs, can I just draw your attention to the next Club Uncut? It’s been a while, but we have the excellent Wild Beasts headlining London’s Borderline club on November 26. Tickets still available, I think. Oh, and apparently Endless Boogie will be in town the week after for a show at the Old Blue Last on December 4. Psyched, as you might imagine. Adverts over. Here’s the main feature: 1 The Flaming Lips – Christmas On Mars (Warner Bros) 2 Cat Power – Dark End Of The Street (Matador) 3 Antony & The Johnsons – The Crying Light (Rough Trade) 4 La Dusseldorf – La Dusseldorf (Water) 5 Ocean – Pantheon Of The Lesser (Important) 6 TV On The Radio – Dancing Choose (4AD) 7 Gentle Friendly – Night Tape (No Pain In Pop) 8 Telepathe – Dance Mother (V2) 9 Various Artists – A Monstrous Psychedelic Bubble Exploding In Your Mind Volume 1: Cosmic Space Music (Platipus) 10 Nina Simone – To Be Free: The Nina Simone Story (SonyBMG) 11 Franz Ferdinand – Tonight: Franz Ferdinand (Domino) 12 Eagles Of Death Metal – Heart On (Downtown) 13 Ron Franklin – Ron Franklin (Alive) 14 Warren Zevon – Warren Zevon (Rhino) 15 Fennesz – Black Sea (Touch) 16 Nickel Eye – The Time Of The Assassins (Ryko) 17 Hunches – Exit Dreams (In The Red) 18 Clinic – Tomorrow (DFA Remix) (Domino) 19 The Mountainhood – Brother The Cloud (Self-released) 20 Bruce Haack – The Electric Lucifer (Omni) 21 The Irrepressibles – From The Circus To The Sea (?) 22 Jesca Hoop – Kismet Acoustic (Nettwerk) 23 Regenorchester XII: Franz Hautzinger/Christian Fennesz/Otomo Yoshohide/Luc Ex/Tony Buck – Town Down (Red Note) 24 Tanlines – New Flowers (Young Turks) 25 Various Artists – The Rapture: Tapes (!K7)

A bumper list this week, as the 2009 releases start arriving in the Uncut office. Not everything here is going down ecstatically, but a first listen to the new Fennesz album today suggests that one was well worth waiting for. In the continuing absence of those My Bloody Valentine reissues, let alone any unreleased material from Kevin Shields’ archives, “Black Sea” really deserves to bring Christian Fennesz to a wider audience, I think.

Elbow: “The Seldom Seen Kid”

0

As promised, the judges' prevarications over the Uncut Music Award shortlist continue today. Here's what they said about the Elbow record. Monday, I'll post the Drive-By Truckers discussions. Tony Wadsworth: Elbow’s my favourite. I tried to be more interesting than that, because they seem to be winning everybody’s album of the year, so I had to keep asking myself the question “is it really?”. The reason it’s my favourite, I think, is because it actually ticks more boxes than any of the others, but important boxes. Emotionally, I find it moving. I think it’s a completely modern record, which I can’t say the same for a lot of the other very good records on the shortlist. I think it’s a real 21st Century record. I think it’s got brilliant production, it’s got phenomenal songwriting, it’s got really serious and moving songs, and it’s got really funny songs. It’s got dynamics. It’s made in the north-west of England, which can’t be bad. I just think it brings together some really fine influences but makes something that is genuinely modern and doesn’t feel like it’s looking back in any way. It feels like a really good heartfelt set of statements, and ultimately I find it emotionally moving. I suppose that’s what you want from a record, really. Allan Jones: What did you find so moving about it? Tony: I don’t know, some of the lyrics I suppose. This idea of male friendship was one thing that came from it, which is not something that people talk about too sensitively. You know, heterosexual male friendship. Danny Kelly: Let’s be clear! Tony: I’ve seen these lads I don’t want to misconstrue anything! No, because male friendship tends to be laddishness, and this isn’t that. This is real, beautiful emotions between long-term friends. That’s the other thing I like about it, the fact that this is a band that have been together for a long time in the same line-up, and obviously still feel very inspired by each other. They spark despite a music business relationship they’ve had which has been chaotic, and nevertheless have managed to get to where they’ve got. That’s their backstory for me, which I find positive as well. It’s a great shiny 21st century record, but it’s got emotion running through it as well, and I think that’s a rarity. Alison Howe: I like Elbow, but I don’t love them, and I feel like I’m in the minority this year. I know the album’s good, but it doesn’t do huge amounts for me. They’re a band I like, and I’m always pleased when they’ve got a new record out and I always look forward to hearing it, but I just don’t have that moment where my heart goes. I think a lot of the songs on it are great, and I think Guy [Garvey] is a great frontman. He helps deliver the songs, particularly live. I think they’re always so much better live than they are on record. I think they’re quite a male group, they appeal to men. I agree with what Tony said, they appeal to men and maybe that’s half the problem. Mark Radcliffe: A lot of women fancy Guy at the moment. I don’t quite understand it, with good-looking guys like me, Danny and Tony around. Alison: He’s a nice bloke, they’re all great, and I love that they’ve had such a great year, because they’ve grafted and the music industry hasn’t, at times, been kind to them. So, I like all that about Elbow and I want to really love their records but I don’t, I can’t explain it. I love the feeling you get when you hear a record for the first time, which is why I think I really like the Bon Iver record, and I find it hard to be loyal to a lot of groups because I’m quite fickle. I like new things, all the time. I like the Elbow record, but it’s not my favourite. Allan: I must agree to a certain extent, despite Tony’s very eloquent endorsement of it, which made it sound a much more interesting record than the record itself says. But it’s probably my least favourite on the shortlist, I find it very hard going. Danny said that when he was listening to Bon Iver he was thinking “get on with it”, and that’s what I felt here, all the way up to probably the last three or four tracks. It’s very hard to love in the way that I was totally engaged by the Bon Iver record, say. It’s very impressive, but somehow it failed to stun me or really move me. But I do agree that live, at Latitude, they really did bring those songs to life, but it’s still a bit... Mark: I have to declare an interest, in that they’re mates of mine and the manager lives in the next street to me, and if Elbow are playing he picks me up and takes me there. Danny: He’ll soon be moving, seeing as this record’s been so successful. Mark: I also ought to tell you that he’s not expecting to win, because he thinks that having won the Mercury Prize it means that they won’t win this. I don’t think it’s the best Elbow album. I love Elbow, I think there are three fantastic songs on this: “Grounds For Divorce”, that would awaken you out of a torpor, that monster riff; “One Day Like This” is probably one of the songs of the year, it’s an anthem that’s been everywhere; and “The Loneliness Of A Tower Crane Driver”, the one they did at the Mercurys, was astonishing that night. But I think the album is short of killer songs. I think Tony’s right in that it’s very current. It’s a facet of getting to 50, in my case, where everything sounds a bit like something, but Elbow doesn’t. Guy sounds a bit like Peter Gabriel at times, but I think he’s a fabulous singer and a really engaging personality. There’s an awful lot going for them, and they are friends of mine, but it’s coming in probably at about Number Three, for me. I think there’s such goodwill towards Elbow, because they’re such lovely people and everybody’s so happy that they won the Mercury, so happy with the success they’ve had, they’ve made friends everywhere they’ve gone, but I think the reviews have perhaps been one star kind. I think Asleep In The Back, their first album, is choc-full of fabulous songs and I don’t think this is. It’s full of fabulous sounds, and the production is great, Craig [Potter] the keyboard player did it in their own studio. If you knew them you would love them, but for me it’s... Danny: I don’t think Mark should apologise for hearing everything in everything else. One of the joys of liking music over a long period of time, I think, is you can actually enjoying hearing where these people are coming from, even when they don’t know it themselves. Last year when The View’s LP came out I thought, well, I’ve heard every note of this before but I really wished I was 17 again so that I could hear it for the first time. It’s all good. I can’t claim to have ever been a huge fan of Elbow, everything Tony says about the record is exactly right, and Mark. There’s some lovely strange noises on it, and the record is restless at times when you expect it to go straight into a 4/4 time. It is out of a certain genre that British music has got itself into now, but every time you expect it to head for the stadium it doesn’t, and I liked all that about it. There are some brilliant and lovely things about it, I liked the opening track “Starlings” a great deal. I do think having the word “confessional” in your opening lyric is a little bit of a statement of intent, and I don’t get the same emotional engagement that Tony got from the record. Since we’re playing the “who does it sound like?” game, the rhythms of some of the words reminded me of no-one less than Pete Sinfield, who used to write for King Crimson and Emerson, Lake & Palmer! Which is a great thing – not a bad thing, that’s a great thing, in my book. Mark’s right about “One Day Like This”, when I saw them playing that on TV from one of the festivals people were going crazy. Ultimately, I agree with Allan. It’s a kind of music that I don’t personally get that engaged by and often find very dull. I wrote down what I thought was a compliment, but now when I see the words “not dull but dignified” written in front of me I’m not sure whether that’s a great recommendation for a record. What I will say is that I love the way he sings in a north-western accent. That can sound incredibly like you’re doing it because you don’t want to sound like somebody else. It reminded me of when you hear strange American twangs or Caribbean twangs how beautiful it can sometimes be because it’s just not the way you speak. I’ve never noticed it very much in British bands, but Guy really does, it’s beautiful the way he enunciates the words. Of course, “Grounds For Divorce” is an amazing song, it’s like they’ve taken everything that was done in the ‘80s in studios in Germany, London and Chicago and gone “there it is”. That’s how this record could sound, that’s how big it could be. There’s one of the examples where you do need speakers the size of wardrobes so you can go “Whoa, listen to that!”. But I have to say that it’s not anywhere near being my favourite. Allan rather cruelly put it at the bottom of these eight, and I’d probably go with that as well. I know it’s won all the awards, but that’s not what we’re here to do, is it? Linda Thompson: I don’t know what this says about my testosterone levels, but I really loved this record. To write great songs is, you know, beyond hard. I just thought it was great, it’s very wordy, I thought the lyrics were clever, I think Guy’s a really good singer, I like people singing in their normal accents. I wasn’t sentimental about them at all, I know they’ve probably been around for a long time, but to me they’ve only been around since yesterday. I really thought this was a great record. It did engage me, but as I was saying to Danny earlier the stuff I like is far away from folk music. Allan: Were there any songs on it that you thought you might like a crack at covering? Linda: Maybe. It’s hard, I haven’t written anything down. When you sent me these things I listened to them right at the beginning, so now I’ve forgotten them all! I loved the bonus track [“We’re Away”], because it sounded like a cabaret tune. I know it’s an awful word, but I think these guys are brave and unafraid. It’s interesting that Mark says they’re nice guys, because I work with a lot of musicians, and if there’s two piano players and one’s an absolute genius but the most horrible guy, and one’s really good but a lovely guy, I always go for them. I just felt they were really nice people, I loved their energy. I loved it, it was right up there for me. Mark: The togetherness of them as a group is lovely to see, they don’t resent the attention that Guy gets at all. They love the fact that he takes all that off them, and there’s absolute harmony there. Linda: Who writes the songs? Mark: Well, Guy writes the words but there is a contribution from everybody. I think putting it bottom out of the eight is absurd, I mean it’s twice the record that half of this shortlist is to me, but it’s not my favourite.

As promised, the judges’ prevarications over the Uncut Music Award shortlist continue today. Here’s what they said about the Elbow record. Monday, I’ll post the Drive-By Truckers discussions.

Leonard Cohen: Behind The Scenes, Part 4!

0

Hallelujah!: LEONARD COHEN SPECIAL In the December issue of Uncut, we celebrate Leonard Cohen’s comeback by getting the inside story from his bandmates on their extraordinary year on the road. Here at www.uncut.co.ukover the next month, we’ll be posting the full, unedited transcripts of those interviews in a new, seven-part series. Today we present singers CHARLEY AND HATTIE WEBB. Adding their plangent tones to Robinson’s to complete Cohen’s trio of back-up angels, the Kent-born multi-instrumentalist sisters recorded their debut, *A Piece of Mind* in Nashville in 2001. A second album *Daylight Crossing* followed in 2006. They’ve recently collaborated with the Kings of Leon’s man in the shadows, Angelo Petraglia. **** UNCUT: When were you approached about the tour? HATTIE: We were in Los Angeles, and a friend of ours, Sharon Robinson, who we’d written with a year before, emailed us and said Leonard was looking for people to join the band, and she’d recommended us. We went down to the rehearsals mid-March. Leonard wasn’t there. We met all the band, and Roscoe, and sang a couple of our songs, and Roscoe gave us a couple of Leonard’s to work on. Then we went back the next day and met Leonard and sang them with Leonard and the band. And we went back the next day and were asked to join the band. They’d been looking for people, one by one, to join the band, since Christmas. It sounds like Roscoe and Leonard had talked almost a year previously about possibly doing a tour; obviously they’ve got a relationship going back decades. They’d thrown around ideas of people Leonard had played with before, but he wanted something fresh in the vocals. Leonard did say to us since that there’s something about the flavour of artists playing together that is a fantastic vibe. I was touched that he seemed to have noticed the songs that we’d written. Was there any sense that he was rusty, having not played so long? CHARLEY: It seemed like something he had been doing for 40 years. I didn’t see any rust falling off him. It felt like a very organic process. First of all, it was like playing chamber music - so, so quiet you could hear a pin drop in the room, even when we were all playing and singing. And just gradually, as the rehearsals developed, we became louder and at times rather raucous. That was the development. Leonard as always seemed to take things in his stride, and be ten steps ahead of everybody else. When the rest of us in the band would be wondering what was going to happen with this song, or this arrangement, there was always this vibe in the air of don’t worry, it’ll work out, and Leonard seems to know already what’s going to happen. That sounds very Zen-like… CHARLEY: Yes, he’s very considered and thoughtful. He goes about things in a very considerate way. He never tries to push anyone. It all happens in its own time. He’s a bit like a lighthouse that never has its light on. He’s never waving his arms in the air. But if you actually look, he’s always there going: “Here you go, friends - this is how we’re going to do it.” HATTIE: It’s a very long concert. I’ve now discovered some very comfortable shoes! CHARLEY: I’m always shocked at the end of the night that we’ve been playing for 3 ½ hours. There’s something about the way Leonard weaves threads between each song. Even when he doesn’t necessarily speak, the songs that he chooses to be in certain orders, and the ebb and flow of the set is a little bit like a long meditation, I think. I’m sure it’s not an accident, after years of sitting in a horse-hair shirt. HATTIE: The main body of the set is very consistent, and then, at the end of the first set, a couple of times we’ve changed the last two or three songs, and the encores change from time to time. Manchester was the first time we played “Famous Blue Raincoat”. We’ve talked about putting new songs into this Fall leg. But there are so many songs that people are requesting at gigs that we haven’t even touched on yet… Do you think some people would find him playing new songs indulgent, when there’s still so much great material in the back catalogue to revisit? HATTIE: Exactly. Although I’m not sure how much Leonard would worry about that. He just hasn’t introduced those new songs yet. We’re still exploring those other songs - sometimes playing them differently, in different time-signatures or with a different feel, and seeing how the audience respond. What about that first show in Fredericton? What can you remember about that? CHARLEY: Leonard seemed really excited. For the first couple of gigs, there was a sense of anticipation, and nerves. Leonard does talk of his nerves that he’s had over the years, and why he used to drink two or three bottles of wine a night to get himself through a performance. He occasionally has now what he calls his “nip” - his whiskey and soda. HATTIE: Actually one night I quite fancied a whiskey and soda in the interval, he was pouring me one out as well. It looked a strange colour, and then we realised that he was pouring Guinness instead of soda. [laughs] CHARLEY: He didn’t seem to mind… HATTIE: We both cracked up, and then he started afresh. CHARLEY: Back then, [at Fredericton], Hattie and I weren’t plugged into what to expect. We’d never seen Leonard live before. A religious experience is an appropriate phrase, for how people see his shows. We would walk on - and it took a while to harden to being affected by grown men and women crying and sobbing and screaming directly in front of you. But Leonard seems to be warmed by that. It’s almost like he could part the Red Sea. He lifts up his microphone, and everything settles. HATTIE: In Fredericton, it was quite overwhelming. Everybody felt it was going to be quite an electric atmosphere. But it was beyond anything that we’d imagined. And so intimate. That was a very small theatre. I think it was a very smart way of Leonard to start the tour. Instead of being in an enormous arena with less personal connection, you could really see the faces of the first twenty rows. It was so tiny, it was like one of those old London theatres. You could almost picture people in Victorian dress. Leonard immediately connected with people, and his own nerves dissipated within a couple of songs. CHARLEY: We all knew what a weighty night that was. And Dublin? The first gig in Europe… CHARLEY: Dublin was raucous, high-energy. We were freezing to death on-stage. It was the coldest I’ve ever been, all of our kneecaps were going up and down, trying not to completely shudder. It was outdoors at night, and the hardy Irish were swinging and dancing in the rain to “So Long, Marianne”, knowing all the words. The outside atmosphere and the weather added to a completely different energy. Was that raucous energy consistent through the Dublin shows, though? HATTIE: It was. There were three nights in Dublin, but the second was the first to be booked and officially sold. The first night was energetic, but the second, with all the die-hards, was absolutely mental. CHARLEY: The security people got completely squashed and swept out of the way by the tides of people coming towards the front, insisting on polkaing and waltzing. Cameramen even zoomed in and captured some couples on their knees - one person was proposing with a ring during “I’m Your Man”. It was crazy. How did the songs stand up to that atmosphere? HATTIE: Something like “Take This Waltz” is very uplifting. Everybody was singing along to that, and “So Long, Marianne” is quite a chanty, beer-swilling song. CHARLEY: But Leonard does some spoken-word poems during the set. And then it was really special to see and feel 13,000 people be completely still. You felt like you were in some kind of church. People would feel and take the weight of the moment. And then be instantly relighting the raucous fire. HATTIE: I think it’s important the set’s long. When we play festivals and we’ve only played for an hour, it felt like you hadn’t quite been able to get into the depths of the feeling. Because just as soon as you’re in it, you’re out of it. It’s like this weird thing that happens in yoga, where you’re in a pose, and you’re hating it and you’re struggling and it hurts, and then you break through to the other side and there’s this feeling of being elated that you’ve managed to hold it for three minutes. Leonard’s sets are like that. Some of his songs are reflective of such pain that he’s been in in the past, in his extremely low points. You go through maybe three songs that reflect that atmosphere. And then you come out the other side and do something like “Closing Time”, extremely light in a way and comical and silly, and you see that side of him. And he takes the audience with him. So over those three hours, you’re being taken through a life, in all its variety? HATTIE: Exactly. And what of Glastonbury? It’s fair to say that was one of the key shows on that first leg? CHARLEY: For a lot of us, including Leonard, Glastonbury was a really important gig. It was the biggest audience, and there was an electric atmosphere for us back-stage. Leonard seemed to be resonating with expectation of playing to a huge crowd. He is someone who is eager to entertain and please, despite the fact that that’s veiled in his own apparently relaxed atmosphere. He did seem like he was a little nervous. He usually makes a wisecrack backstage. Somebody took his photo as he was going up the steps, and then we got to behind the curtain. And we stood there all together, and he peeked round the curtain, and said: “There’s a few people here tonight, friends…” And there were 100,000 people in front of us. Does he conspicuously get nervous for those crucial gigs? HATTIE: I only ever see him excited to play shows. I don’t see him nervous. CHARLEY: I think he’s often a little nervous. But, being in his seventies, and having brought up two children, and done so many shows before, he does lead the band on. Every time we walk on, he says: “Come on, friends, let’s go!” I think he feels an obligation to all of us to lead us on. So I think he doesn’t like to show his nerves too much. But I think he is nervous. From what you were saying about dark times in his life - do you get the impression that he draws on, or revisits, those times as he sings? HATTIE: He sings every night really, truly from the heart. I’m sure he revisits the true emotion it came from. CHARLEY: He seems like someone who is very present. He does talk about things that have gone on before. But sometimes he says, “Oh, I can’t remember that any more.” I’m amazed he remembers all the words, to be honest. Sometimes he seems to reflect on things that have happened before. But most of the time he seems to be here and now, going forward. The final gig of the first leg was The Big Chill. How was that..? Was it like the last day of school..? HATTIE: It was very exciting. It was like the last day of school, when you’re hugging all your friends, and everyone felt very happy. Charley and I went into the festival a little early, and I walked back-stage in a hippie festival dress, and Leonard said to me: “You’d better cover up your knees, darlin’, because there are old men in here!” CHARLEY: I think everybody was quite happy to play that festival, but also happy that it was the last of the leg. Because we had been out for what seemed to be too long. Too long certainly for Leonard. When he was on-stage you would never have known, because he’s so professional and really gives it his all. But off-stage, he and all of us were weary. It was the music and the energy of being on-stage that kept us going. It was a little too long to have been away from the realities of life. Leonard talked of really wanting to spend some time in Montreal, and at his home in LA. He wouldn’t mention things like that very much. But if pressed, he’d say he was looking forward to that. Everybody was tired by that point. And so, a little like a toddler who gets more energy in the last couple of hours before they go to sleep, we were like that on-stage, knowing that that was the last one. You reconvened for the Fall leg. The first show, in Bucharest, took place on September 21, Leonard’s 74th birthday. What can you tell us about that? CHARLEY: It was a good birthday. We were quite surprised, because Leonard’s family are all Virgos, so none of them are that big on fuss. We talked the day before, as a band: “What shall we do on Leonard’s birthday?” And we agreed “Nothing” was the right response. But the people in Bucharest were really charming, and the show was punctuated with “Happy Birthday to you,” the only lyrics, over and over, which we were all laughing at. And then some people come up on stage with some enormous cakes that were heavier than Leonard, which he held for a few minutes, till we rescued him. HATTIE: I actually had a piece, I don’t know if he did. The whole cake was made of foamy icing, there was no actual cake. CHARLEY: It was the kind of cake you could’ve pied someone in the face with! Leonard always tastes, but he never really indulges in an enormous portion. He’s a sensitive person, so I’m sure he was touched. He didn’t talk of it much, because he gets whisked away from the stage immediately after the performance, in order to maximise the rest he’s got to have. But he always seems touched by any personal gesture like that. It’s probably a mixture of embarrassment, and being touched. We’d be interested, I think, in some of your memories and impressions of Leonard… HATTIE: He has such an amazing smile. His sense of humour and his kindness - always thinking of everyone, from someone who’s taking the guitars to a guest who’s visiting, he’s so considerate. His jokes, and funny quips. The other night, in Bucharest, we were coming off at the end and it was raining, and the steps down from the stage were wet. I said, “Oh, Leonard, grab my arm, it’s very slippery.” He said, “Don’t worry, darling! I’m as sure-footed as a mountain goat.” [laughs] Does he go out very often with the rest of you? CHARLEY: Leonard doesn’t often go out after the show. We often don’t finish till 12.30 at night, and that also means there are people who’ve been to the concert around the hotel, seeing if they can see Leonard. It can be very intrusive for him. So after the gigs, he goes back, and often we don’t see him till the next day. HATTIE: We socialise and have a meal together before the gigs, at the venue. Leonard always has his nutritious Smoothie. And we often socialise as we travel, and those are the times that resonate the most, in terms of togetherness, and getting to know the real Leonard. CHARLEY: Leonard will always choose the smallest or least comfortable seat in the room or on the plane, and he’ll always leave the nicest ones to other people. He insists on that, he quietly goes about it, and if you try to change it he goes: “No, please, after you…” Total graciousness and gentlemanliness from Leonard, all the time. But then surprising openness, with very amusing stories. We have very interesting social conversations all together, about marriage, divorce, infidelity, religion, politics. And Leonard isn’t quiet in those conversations. He almost always says what he thinks, there’s no question about that. Those are the times I’ve enjoyed the most. HATTIE: One time we were on the plane and it was incredibly bumpy, and all the people around me were very frightened, and of course you’re reading stories all the time of small planes going down. I was gripping hold of my drink, and seeing my life flashing before my eyes, and I looked over at Leonard. He seemed completely and utterly calm, and said: “Don’t worry, darling, nothing can happen to you - it’s just the way it is.” That’s what we take from Leonard. He worries about the small things and deals with those. And with the big things, he lets nature take its course. CHARLEY: Whilst he eats a very healthy diet, like a Zen Buddhist would, every now and again we discover he’s slipped out the back door and gone to McDonalds to buy a Filet O’Fish! HATTIE: He sometimes goes on a walk when we get to a town, looking in windows and sucking up the scene. CHARLEY: We tried to say to him that if he put a baseball cap on, and a sweater and an old pair of jeans, he wouldn’t be recognised. But he’s always got his fedora on, and his long rain mac over the top of his suit. There wasn’t even a glimmer of thought that he might consider wearing anything else. I think a lot of towns he’s been to before. So in those moments, he takes some time to have some silence and quiet to himself. Sometimes he’ll go out for a walk, or a croissant or a coffee. But in places that he’s been to before, he can resonate on those memories looking out of his window in the privacy and silence of his room. I think that’s quite important for him, bearing in mind people are always engaging him when he’s outside. HATTIE: This tour’s been very enriching for me - not just being around Leonard and his amazing spirit, but the songs, and their diversity and complex lyrical nature. As a songwriter as well, it’s been a great insight. To actually sing his songs every night is different to just whacking them on the stereo. CHARLEY: There’s certainly a magic to the way Leonard moves - a spark in his eye that you don’t really see in people. It’s not just Leonard’s songs, not just the way he expresses himself. It’s him as well that people respond to. I’m sure that’s why, for decades, people remain enthralled. For me, the richness of all his experiences, the way he’s seen the real rock’n’roll culture of the Sixties, the way he’s been on the interior of stories that have been handed down through press and our pop culture - he was there, and he’s experienced that. But he’s also been the father of two normal yet lovely children who he’s brought up himself to be adults. He’s also investigated and been part of so many religions. I don’t always agree with what Leonard says. I don’t always agree with his social choices. But he doesn’t make any apologies for the way he feels, and he’s not nervous to say what he thinks. When we discuss men and women, and the way we interact, romantically or socially, Leonard makes no apologies for men’s desires and expectations, and the way society requires men and women to have traditional roles. When Leonard talks about his past relationships, I’m always impressed to hear that lots of the women that he seems to have been with, respect him and still speak to him and still want to be friends with him - despite the fact that you read Leonard was rather a Lothario. He seems to have been able to lead that life, at the same time as retaining the respect and the love of the people he’s been with. INTERVIEWS: NICK HASTED

Hallelujah!: LEONARD COHEN SPECIAL

In the December issue of Uncut, we celebrate Leonard Cohen’s comeback by getting the inside story from his bandmates on their extraordinary year on the road. Here at www.uncut.co.ukover the next month, we’ll be posting the full, unedited transcripts of those interviews in a new, seven-part series.

Today we present singers CHARLEY AND HATTIE WEBB.

Adding their plangent tones to Robinson’s to complete Cohen’s trio of back-up angels, the Kent-born multi-instrumentalist sisters recorded their debut, *A Piece of Mind* in Nashville in 2001. A second album *Daylight Crossing* followed in 2006. They’ve recently collaborated with the Kings of Leon’s man in the shadows, Angelo Petraglia.

****

UNCUT: When were you approached about the tour?

HATTIE: We were in Los Angeles, and a friend of ours, Sharon Robinson, who we’d written with a year before, emailed us and said Leonard was looking for people to join the band, and she’d recommended us. We went down to the rehearsals mid-March. Leonard wasn’t there. We met all the band, and Roscoe, and sang a couple of our songs, and Roscoe gave us a couple of Leonard’s to work on. Then we went back the next day and met Leonard and sang them with Leonard and the band. And we went back the next day and were asked to join the band.

They’d been looking for people, one by one, to join the band, since Christmas. It sounds like Roscoe and Leonard had talked almost a year previously about possibly doing a tour; obviously they’ve got a relationship going back decades. They’d thrown around ideas of people Leonard had played with before, but he wanted something fresh in the vocals. Leonard did say to us since that there’s something about the flavour of artists playing together that is a fantastic vibe. I was touched that he seemed to have noticed the songs that we’d written.

Was there any sense that he was rusty, having not played so long?

CHARLEY: It seemed like something he had been doing for 40 years. I didn’t see any rust falling off him. It felt like a very organic process. First of all, it was like playing chamber music – so, so quiet you could hear a pin drop in the room, even when we were all playing and singing. And just gradually, as the rehearsals developed, we became louder and at times rather raucous. That was the development. Leonard as always seemed to take things in his stride, and be ten steps ahead of everybody else. When the rest of us in the band would be wondering what was going to happen with this song, or this arrangement, there was always this vibe in the air of don’t worry, it’ll work out, and Leonard seems to know already what’s going to happen.

That sounds very Zen-like…

CHARLEY: Yes, he’s very considered and thoughtful. He goes about things in a very considerate way. He never tries to push anyone. It all happens in its own time. He’s a bit like a lighthouse that never has its light on. He’s never waving his arms in the air. But if you actually look, he’s always there going: “Here you go, friends – this is how we’re going to do it.”

HATTIE: It’s a very long concert. I’ve now discovered some very comfortable shoes!

CHARLEY: I’m always shocked at the end of the night that we’ve been playing for 3 ½ hours. There’s something about the way Leonard weaves threads between each song. Even when he doesn’t necessarily speak, the songs that he chooses to be in certain orders, and the ebb and flow of the set is a little bit like a long meditation, I think. I’m sure it’s not an accident, after years of sitting in a horse-hair shirt.

HATTIE: The main body of the set is very consistent, and then, at the end of the first set, a couple of times we’ve changed the last two or three songs, and the encores change from time to time. Manchester was the first time we played “Famous Blue Raincoat”. We’ve talked about putting new songs into this Fall leg. But there are so many songs that people are requesting at gigs that we haven’t even touched on yet…

Do you think some people would find him playing new songs indulgent, when there’s still so much great material in the back catalogue to revisit?

HATTIE: Exactly. Although I’m not sure how much Leonard would worry about that. He just hasn’t introduced those new songs yet. We’re still exploring those other songs – sometimes playing them differently, in different time-signatures or with a different feel, and seeing how the audience respond.

What about that first show in Fredericton? What can you remember about that?

CHARLEY: Leonard seemed really excited. For the first couple of gigs, there was a sense of anticipation, and nerves. Leonard does talk of his nerves that he’s had over the years, and why he used to drink two or three bottles of wine a night to get himself through a performance. He occasionally has now what he calls his “nip” – his whiskey and soda.

HATTIE: Actually one night I quite fancied a whiskey and soda in the interval, he was pouring me one out as well. It looked a strange colour, and then we realised that he was pouring Guinness instead of soda. [laughs]

CHARLEY: He didn’t seem to mind…

HATTIE: We both cracked up, and then he started afresh.

CHARLEY: Back then, [at Fredericton], Hattie and I weren’t plugged into what to expect. We’d never seen Leonard live before. A religious experience is an appropriate phrase, for how people see his shows. We would walk on – and it took a while to harden to being affected by grown men and women crying and sobbing and screaming directly in front of you. But Leonard seems to be warmed by that. It’s almost like he could part the Red Sea. He lifts up his microphone, and everything settles.

HATTIE: In Fredericton, it was quite overwhelming. Everybody felt it was going to be quite an electric atmosphere. But it was beyond anything that we’d imagined. And so intimate. That was a very small theatre. I think it was a very smart way of Leonard to start the tour. Instead of being in an enormous arena with less personal connection, you could really see the faces of the first twenty rows. It was so tiny, it was like one of those old London theatres. You could almost picture people in Victorian dress. Leonard immediately connected with people, and his own nerves dissipated within a couple of songs.

CHARLEY: We all knew what a weighty night that was.

And Dublin? The first gig in Europe…

CHARLEY: Dublin was raucous, high-energy. We were freezing to death on-stage. It was the coldest I’ve ever been, all of our kneecaps were going up and down, trying not to completely shudder. It was outdoors at night, and the hardy Irish were swinging and dancing in the rain to “So Long, Marianne”, knowing all the words. The outside atmosphere and the weather added to a completely different energy.

Was that raucous energy consistent through the Dublin shows, though?

HATTIE: It was. There were three nights in Dublin, but the second was the first to be booked and officially sold. The first night was energetic, but the second, with all the die-hards, was absolutely mental.

CHARLEY: The security people got completely squashed and swept out of the way by the tides of people coming towards the front, insisting on polkaing and waltzing. Cameramen even zoomed in and captured some couples on their knees – one person was proposing with a ring during “I’m Your Man”. It was crazy.

How did the songs stand up to that atmosphere?

HATTIE: Something like “Take This Waltz” is very uplifting. Everybody was singing along to that, and “So Long, Marianne” is quite a chanty, beer-swilling song.

CHARLEY: But Leonard does some spoken-word poems during the set. And then it was really special to see and feel 13,000 people be completely still. You felt like you were in some kind of church. People would feel and take the weight of the moment. And then be instantly relighting the raucous fire.

HATTIE: I think it’s important the set’s long. When we play festivals and we’ve only played for an hour, it felt like you hadn’t quite been able to get into the depths of the feeling. Because just as soon as you’re in it, you’re out of it. It’s like this weird thing that happens in yoga, where you’re in a pose, and you’re hating it and you’re struggling and it hurts, and then you break through to the other side and there’s this feeling of being elated that you’ve managed to hold it for three minutes. Leonard’s sets are like that. Some of his songs are reflective of such pain that he’s been in in the past, in his extremely low points. You go through maybe three songs that reflect that atmosphere. And then you come out the other side and do something like “Closing Time”, extremely light in a way and comical and silly, and you see that side of him. And he takes the audience with him.

So over those three hours, you’re being taken through a life, in all its variety?

HATTIE: Exactly.

And what of Glastonbury? It’s fair to say that was one of the key shows on that first leg?

CHARLEY: For a lot of us, including Leonard, Glastonbury was a really important gig. It was the biggest audience, and there was an electric atmosphere for us back-stage. Leonard seemed to be resonating with expectation of playing to a huge crowd. He is someone who is eager to entertain and please, despite the fact that that’s veiled in his own apparently relaxed atmosphere. He did seem like he was a little nervous. He usually makes a wisecrack backstage. Somebody took his photo as he was going up the steps, and then we got to behind the curtain. And we stood there all together, and he peeked round the curtain, and said: “There’s a few people here tonight, friends…” And there were 100,000 people in front of us.

Does he conspicuously get nervous for those crucial gigs?

HATTIE: I only ever see him excited to play shows. I don’t see him nervous.

CHARLEY: I think he’s often a little nervous. But, being in his seventies, and having brought up two children, and done so many shows before, he does lead the band on. Every time we walk on, he says: “Come on, friends, let’s go!” I think he feels an obligation to all of us to lead us on. So I think he doesn’t like to show his nerves too much. But I think he is nervous.

From what you were saying about dark times in his life – do you get the impression that he draws on, or revisits, those times as he sings?

HATTIE: He sings every night really, truly from the heart. I’m sure he revisits the true emotion it came from.

CHARLEY: He seems like someone who is very present. He does talk about things that have gone on before. But sometimes he says, “Oh, I can’t remember that any more.” I’m amazed he remembers all the words, to be honest. Sometimes he seems to reflect on things that have happened before. But most of the time he seems to be here and now, going forward.

The final gig of the first leg was The Big Chill. How was that..? Was it like the last day of school..?

HATTIE: It was very exciting. It was like the last day of school, when you’re hugging all your friends, and everyone felt very happy. Charley and I went into the festival a little early, and I walked back-stage in a hippie festival dress, and Leonard said to me: “You’d better cover up your knees, darlin’, because there are old men in here!”

CHARLEY: I think everybody was quite happy to play that festival, but also happy that it was the last of the leg. Because we had been out for what seemed to be too long. Too long certainly for Leonard. When he was on-stage you would never have known, because he’s so professional and really gives it his all. But off-stage, he and all of us were weary. It was the music and the energy of being on-stage that kept us going. It was a little too long to have been away from the realities of life. Leonard talked of really wanting to spend some time in Montreal, and at his home in LA. He wouldn’t mention things like that very much. But if pressed, he’d say he was looking forward to that. Everybody was tired by that point. And so, a little like a toddler who gets more energy in the last couple of hours before they go to sleep, we were like that on-stage, knowing that that was the last one.

You reconvened for the Fall leg. The first show, in Bucharest, took place on September 21, Leonard’s 74th birthday. What can you tell us about that?

CHARLEY: It was a good birthday. We were quite surprised, because Leonard’s family are all Virgos, so none of them are that big on fuss. We talked the day before, as a band: “What shall we do on Leonard’s birthday?” And we agreed “Nothing” was the right response. But the people in Bucharest were really charming, and the show was punctuated with “Happy Birthday to you,” the only lyrics, over and over, which we were all laughing at. And then some people come up on stage with some enormous cakes that were heavier than Leonard, which he held for a few minutes, till we rescued him.

HATTIE: I actually had a piece, I don’t know if he did. The whole cake was made of foamy icing, there was no actual cake.

CHARLEY: It was the kind of cake you could’ve pied someone in the face with! Leonard always tastes, but he never really indulges in an enormous portion. He’s a sensitive person, so I’m sure he was touched. He didn’t talk of it much, because he gets whisked away from the stage immediately after the performance, in order to maximise the rest he’s got to have. But he always seems touched by any personal gesture like that. It’s probably a mixture of embarrassment, and being touched.

We’d be interested, I think, in some of your memories and impressions of Leonard…

HATTIE: He has such an amazing smile. His sense of humour and his kindness – always thinking of everyone, from someone who’s taking the guitars to a guest who’s visiting, he’s so considerate. His jokes, and funny quips. The other night, in Bucharest, we were coming off at the end and it was raining, and the steps down from the stage were wet. I said, “Oh, Leonard, grab my arm, it’s very slippery.” He said, “Don’t worry, darling! I’m as sure-footed as a mountain goat.” [laughs]

Does he go out very often with the rest of you?

CHARLEY: Leonard doesn’t often go out after the show. We often don’t finish till 12.30 at night, and that also means there are people who’ve been to the concert around the hotel, seeing if they can see Leonard. It can be very intrusive for him. So after the gigs, he goes back, and often we don’t see him till the next day.

HATTIE: We socialise and have a meal together before the gigs, at the venue. Leonard always has his nutritious Smoothie. And we often socialise as we travel, and those are the times that resonate the most, in terms of togetherness, and getting to know the real Leonard.

CHARLEY: Leonard will always choose the smallest or least comfortable seat in the room or on the plane, and he’ll always leave the nicest ones to other people. He insists on that, he quietly goes about it, and if you try to change it he goes: “No, please, after you…” Total graciousness and gentlemanliness from Leonard, all the time. But then surprising openness, with very amusing stories. We have very interesting social conversations all together, about marriage, divorce, infidelity, religion, politics. And Leonard isn’t quiet in those conversations. He almost always says what he thinks, there’s no question about that. Those are the times I’ve enjoyed the most.

HATTIE: One time we were on the plane and it was incredibly bumpy, and all the people around me were very frightened, and of course you’re reading stories all the time of small planes going down. I was gripping hold of my drink, and seeing my life flashing before my eyes, and I looked over at Leonard. He seemed completely and utterly calm, and said: “Don’t worry, darling, nothing can happen to you – it’s just the way it is.” That’s what we take from Leonard. He worries about the small things and deals with those. And with the big things, he lets nature take its course.

CHARLEY: Whilst he eats a very healthy diet, like a Zen Buddhist would, every now and again we discover he’s slipped out the back door and gone to McDonalds to buy a Filet O’Fish!

HATTIE: He sometimes goes on a walk when we get to a town, looking in windows and sucking up the scene.

CHARLEY: We tried to say to him that if he put a baseball cap on, and a sweater and an old pair of jeans, he wouldn’t be recognised. But he’s always got his fedora on, and his long rain mac over the top of his suit. There wasn’t even a glimmer of thought that he might consider wearing anything else.

I think a lot of towns he’s been to before. So in those moments, he takes some time to have some silence and quiet to himself. Sometimes he’ll go out for a walk, or a croissant or a coffee. But in places that he’s been to before, he can resonate on those memories looking out of his window in the privacy and silence of his room. I think that’s quite important for him, bearing in mind people are always engaging him when he’s outside.

HATTIE: This tour’s been very enriching for me – not just being around Leonard and his amazing spirit, but the songs, and their diversity and complex lyrical nature. As a songwriter as well, it’s been a great insight. To actually sing his songs every night is different to just whacking them on the stereo.

CHARLEY: There’s certainly a magic to the way Leonard moves – a spark in his eye that you don’t really see in people. It’s not just Leonard’s songs, not just the way he expresses himself. It’s him as well that people respond to. I’m sure that’s why, for decades, people remain enthralled. For me, the richness of all his experiences, the way he’s seen the real rock’n’roll culture of the Sixties, the way he’s been on the interior of stories that have been handed down through press and our pop culture – he was there, and he’s experienced that. But he’s also been the father of two normal yet lovely children who he’s brought up himself to be adults. He’s also investigated and been part of so many religions.

I don’t always agree with what Leonard says. I don’t always agree with his social choices. But he doesn’t make any apologies for the way he feels, and he’s not nervous to say what he thinks. When we discuss men and women, and the way we interact, romantically or socially, Leonard makes no apologies for men’s desires and expectations, and the way society requires men and women to have traditional roles. When Leonard talks about his past relationships, I’m always impressed to hear that lots of the women that he seems to have been with, respect him and still speak to him and still want to be friends with him – despite the fact that you read Leonard was rather a Lothario. He seems to have been able to lead that life, at the same time as retaining the respect and the love of the people he’s been with.

INTERVIEWS: NICK HASTED